Vol 35 | Issue 3 | September-December 2020 | page: 44-48 | Atin Jaiswal, Yashwant Singh Tanwar
Authors: Atin Jaiswal , Yashwant Singh Tanwar 
 Department of Orthopedics, Vivekanand polyclinic and institute of medical sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
 Department of Orthopedics, Indraprastha Appolo Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Atin Jaiswal,
Vivekanand polyclinic and institute of medical sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Distal femur physeal fracture in adolescent age group are unpredictable in view of their prognosis and complications. We present a case of distal end femur fracture due to its unusual configuration and management in a 13 years male patient. This patient was treated by open reduction and internal fixation with distal femoral locking plate with screws spanning the physes. We also want to report this case as it showed features of impending physeal arrest which was reversible after removal of transphyseal screws which were promoting epiphysiodesis. End result was anatomical healing of fracture with no limb length discrepancy and deformity and fully preserved joint motion. This report shows that effective management of physeal injuries and timely intervention can lead to successful outcome even in a limited resource setup. However we should be prepared to anticipate and manage adverse outcome and complications while handling such injuries.
Keywords: Physeal, Distal femur, Fracture
1. Arkader A, Warner WC, Jr., Horn BD, Shaw RN, Wells L. Predicting the outcome of physeal fractures of the distal femur. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2007;27(6):703–708. [PubMed]
2. (BasenarCJ, Mehlman CT, Dipasquale TG. Growth disturbance after distal femoral growth plate fractures in children: a meta–analysis. J Orthop Trauma.2009;23(9):663- 667)
3. Campbell operative orthopaedics12th ed
4. Thomson JD1, Stricker SJ, Williams MM. Fractures of the distal femoral epiphyseal plate.JPediatrOrthop. 1995 Jul- Aug;15(4):474-8.
5. Anderson M, Messner MB, Green WT. Distribution of lengths of the normal femur and tibia in children from one to eighteen years of age. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American. 1964;46:1197–1202.[PubMed]
6. Torg JS, Pavlov H, Morris VB. Salter-Harris type-III fracture of the medial femoral condyle occurring in the adolescent athlete. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American. 1981;63(4):586–591. [PubMed]
7. Riseborough EJ, Barrett IR, Shapiro F. Growth disturbances following distal femoral physeal fracture-separations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65(7):885-893.].
8. Mäkelä EA1, Vainionpää S, Vihtonen K, Mero M, Laiho J, Törmälä P, Rokkanen P. Healing of physeal fracture after
fixation with biodegradable self-reinforced polyglycolic acid pins. An experimental study on growing rabbits..Clin Mater. 1990;5(1):1-12
9. Salter RB, Harris WR. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:587-622
10. Lombardo SJ, Harvey JP Jr. Fractures of the distal femoral epiphyses. Factors influencing prognosis: a review of thirtyfour cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977; Sep;59(6): 742-51.
11. Khoshhal KI, Kiefer GN. Physeal bridge resection. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005; Jan-Feb;13(1): 47-58].
|How to Cite this Article: Jaiswal A, Tanwar Y S | Reversible Physeal Arrest In An Adolescent Intraarticular Distal Femur Fracture With Unusual Configuration: A Case Report | Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases | September-December 2020; 35(3): 444-48.|