Vol 35 | Issue 2 | May-Aug 2020 | page: 42-46 | Alok Gupta¹, Rajendra Kumar Beniwal², Saumya Agarwal², Shivank Prakash¹
Authors: Alok Gupta¹, Rajendra Kumar Beniwal², Saumya Agarwal², Shivank Prakash¹
¹Department of orthopaedics, Haryana Multispeciality Hospital, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
¹Department of orthopaedics, Central Institute of Orthopaedics, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
¹Department of orthopaedics, Sports Injury Centre, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Saumya Agarwal
Central Institute of Orthopaedics, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Email Id- firstname.lastname@example.org
Background: A rotator cuff tear is one the most frequent shoulder lesions that require surgical treatment. Methods: 30 patients within the span of 2 years underwent mini open repair for the rotatory cuff tear diagnosed with the help of noninvasive imaging. Pre-operative evaluation of shoulder function was done using the University of California Los Angeles [UCLA] scale. Results: There was sequential improvement in pain, which was significant at 9 to 18 weeks and 18 to 24 weeks interval. There was sequential improvement in the range of motion. The mean score for function was pre-operatively was 5.86. Post-operatively, the mean score was 6.13 at 9 weeks, 7.20 at 18 weeks and 9.60 at 24 weeks. After final UCLA score at 24 weeks sixteen patients (53.33%) were rated as having excellent result, twelve patients (40%) as having good result, and two (6.66%) as having poor result. 28 out of the 30 patients were satisfied with the overall result.
Conclusion: Thus, when comparing mini-open and traditional open methods of rotator cuff repair, it appears that outcomes do not significantly differ. However, the advantages of mini-open repair, which include preservation of the deltoid origin, lower peri-operative morbidity, enhanced cosmesis, shortened rehabilitation, and arthroscopic evaluation of the glenohumeral joint for additional pathology, make it an overall superior method.
Keywords: Rotator cuff tear, Arthroscopy, Shoulder mini open repair
1) Kessel L and Watson M. The painful arc syndrome. Clinical classification as a guide to management. J Bone Joint Surg 59B: 166-172, 1977.
2) Codman, E.A. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research: May 1990 – Volume 254 – Issue – p 3-26.
3) Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972; 54: 41-50.
4) Hawkins RJ, Brock RM, Abrams JS, Hobeika P. Acromioplasty for impingement with intact rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg 70B: 795-797, 1988.
5) Bjorkenheim JM, Paavolainen P, Ahovuo J, Slatis P. Subacromial impingement decompressed with anterior acromioplasty. Clin Orthop 252: 150-155, 1990.
6) Norlin R. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus open acromioplasty. Arthroscopy 5: 321-323, 1989.
7) Romeo Anthony A, Mazzocca Augustus, Hang David W, Shott Susan, Bach Bernard R Jr. Shoulder Scoring Scales for the Evaluation of Rotator Cuff Repair. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 427:107-114, October 2004.
8) Nari Yamada et al. Comparison of conservative and open treatments of massive rotator cuff tears. Tokai J Exp Clin Med., No. 4-6;151-163, 2000.
9) Galanopoulos, C.Yannakopoulas, E. Antonogiannakis. Arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears: mid term results. Jour of the Hellenic Assoc Ortho Traum. 57: 4, 2006.
10) Josh B. Moosikasuwan et al. Rotator cuff tears: Clinical, Radiographic & USG findings. Radiographics: 25:1591-1607. 2005.
11) Callis M, Akgun K, Birtane M, Karacan I, Callis H and Tuzun F. Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000; 59: 44-7.
12) Bigliani LU, Morrison D and April EW. The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans 10: 228, 1986.
13) Ara Kassarjian, Jenny T. Bencardino, William E. Palmer. MR Imaging of Rotator cuff. Radiol Clin N. Am 44 (2006) 503-23.
14) Hersch, JC; Sgaglione, NA. Arthroscopically assisted mini-open rotator cuff repairs. Functional outcome at 2- to 7- year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:301-311.
15) Weber, SC, et al. ‘Mini-open’ Versus Traditional Open Repair in the Management of small and Moderate Size Tears of the Rotator Cuff. Arthroscopy.1993;9.
16) Baker CL, Liu SH. Comparison of Open and Arthroscopically Assisted Rotator Cuff Repair. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1995;23.
17) Hata Y et al. A less invasive surgery for rotator cuff tear: Mini-open repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 11-6
|How to Cite this Article: Gupta A, Beniwal R A, Agarwal S, Prakash S | To analyze the clinical and functional outcome in patients undergoing an arthroscopically assisted ‘mini open repair’ of rotator cuff tear. | Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases | May-Aug 2020; 35(2): 42-46 .|