Vol 35 | Issue 2 | May-Aug 2020 | page: 30-35 | Amit Saraf¹, Vakul Mahipal¹, Najmul Huda¹
Authors: Amit Saraf¹, Vakul Mahipal¹, Najmul Huda¹
¹Department of Orthopaedics, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.
Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Najmul Huda
Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.
E-mail – email@example.com
Aim: The aim of our work is to assess the clinico-radiological and functional outcome in management of humerus diaphyseal fracture by anterior bridge plating with MIPO technique. METHODS: 21 patients of traumatic diaphyseal fractures of humerus were managed by Anterior Bridge Plating using MIPO technique between 2017- 2018 in a series conducted at our center. The side affected, gender ratio, surgery time, fracture union time and complication were noted. UCLA shoulder and Mayo elbow performance score were used. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 11(52.4%) males and 10(47.6%) females. The mean age was 39.71±13.18 (Range = 18-65) years. Mean surgical time was 99.52 minutes. Road traffic injury was the most common mode. 1 case of infection 2 of non union and 3 cases of post op radial nerve palsy encountered and resolved accordingly. The mean UCLA shoulder and MEPS showed statistically significant improvement in functional outcome with time. CONCLUSION: There is statistically significant improvement in clinic-radiological and functional outcome with time. Anterior Bridge plating with MIPO technique is a good technique which respects the biological fixation principles and causes minimal soft tissue assault while preserving the fracture haematoma and maintains periosteal blood channels for management of humeral diaphyseal fractures.
Keywords: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), Diaphyseal fracture humerus, Anterior bridge plating
1. Mader K, Mader S, Berntsson P-O. The Diaphysis: Nonsurgical Treatment. Simple and Complex Fractures of the Humerus. Springer Milan; 2012:13-20.
2. Sarmiento A, Latta L. Functional fracture bracing: tibia, humerus, and ulna. Springer Science & Business Media. 1995.
3. Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, Hansson K, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:1469-73.
4. Garnavos C. Humerus shaft fractures. Rockwood and greens fractures in adults. 2015.
5. Caldwell JA. Treatment of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by HangingCast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1940;70:421-5.
6. Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG. Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1977; 59A:596-601.
7. Chao TC, Chou WY, Chung JC, Hsu CJ. Humeral shaft fractures treated by dynamic compression plates, Ender nails and interlocking nails. Int Orthop. 2005;29:88-91.
8. Camden P, Nade S. Fracture bracing of the humerus. Injury. 1992;23:245-8.
9. Baumgaertel F, Buhl M, Rahn BA. Fracture healing in biological plate osteosynthesis. Injury. 1998; 29(Suppl 3):C3‑6.
10. Dickson KF, Munz JW. Locked plating: Biomechanics and biology. Tech Orthop. 2007; 22:4.
11. Wagner M, Frenk A, Frigg R. Locked plating: Biomechanics and biology and locked plating: Clinical indications. Tech Orthop.2007; 22:4.
12. Kulkarni M, Kulkarni V, Kulkarni S. Treatment of Humerus Diaphyseal Fractures with Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis. J Fract Sprains. 2017;1(1):1007.
13. Walker M, Palumbo B, Badman B, Brooks J, Van Gelderen J, Mighell M. Humeral shaft fractures: a review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(5):833-44.
14. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CA.Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(4):478-86.
15. Kurup H, Hossain M, Andrew JG. Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(6):CD005959.
16. An Z, Zeng B, He X, Chen Q, Hu S. Plating osteosynthesis of mid-distal humeral shaft fractures: minimally invasive versus conventional open reduction technique. Int Orthop. 2010;34(1):131-5.
17. Kim JW, Oh CW, Byun YS, Kim JJ, Park KC. A prospective randomized study of operative treatment for non comminuted humeral shaft fractures: conventional open plating versus minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(4):189-94.
18. Vegad T et al. Follow up assessment of patients with humeral bridge plate technique with two year period Int J Res Orthop. 2017 Jul;3(4):867-870.
19. AO/OTA FRACTURE AND DISLOCATION CLASSIFICATION COMPENDIUM -2018
20. Livani B, Belangero WD. Bridging plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures. Injury:2004 Jun:35(6):587-.95 Doi: 10.1016/j. injury. 2003.12.003.
21. Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;155:7-20.
22. Morrey BF, An KN, Chao EY. Functional evaluation of the elbow. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1993. p. 86-97.
23. Deepak S, Holagundi L, Dayanand, Padmanabha, Murulidharan N. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis by anterior approach for fracture shaft of Humerus. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2016;2(3):22-26.
24. Shetty MS, Kumar MA, Sujay K, Kini AR, Kanthi KG. Minimallyinvasive plate osteosynthesis for humerus diaphysealfractures. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(6):520-6.
25. Ibrahim M, Rathod VH. A clinical study of minimal invasive anterior bridge plating for humerus shaft fractures. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences. 2018;4(2):1-5.
26. Lal YM, Mishra AK, Kushwaha AS and Badoni N. A clinical study of anterior bridge plating for humerus shaft fractures by minimal invasive technique. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2019; 5(3): 122-125.
27. Sanjeevaiah, Praneeth Reddy. Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Humeral Shaft Fractures – Biomechanics – Design – Clinical Results. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2015;(4)54:9449-9456.
28. Oh CW, Byun YS, Oh JK, Kim JJ, Jeon IH, Lee JH, Park KH. Plating of humeral shaft fractures: Comparison of standard conventional plating versus minimally invasive plating. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2012;98:54-60.
29. Sharma J, Jain A, Jain PG, Upadhyaya P. Anterior Bridge Plating with Mini Incision MIPO technique for Humerus Diaphyseal Fractures. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Surgery 2015;1(3):171-5.
30. Concha JM, Sandoval A, Streubel PN. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures: are results reproducible? International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2010;34:1297–305.
|How to Cite this Article: Saraf A, Mahipal V, Huda N | To analyze the clinical and functional outcome in patients undergoing an arthroscopically assisted ‘mini open repair’ of rotator cuff tear | Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases | May-Aug 2020; 35(2): 30-35 .|